Should I exclude tracks that are wack? Initially, I wanted The Tape Deck to contain as much content as possible. Diversity was the key. But would you prefer that I restrict it to tracks that I think are worth it? Lemme know...
That would be the move, Im fed up of having to delete all the bollox tracks anyway, but then again, stuff i like might not be what other readers want, so maybe just keep it the way you already have it, One!
you should exclude what's whack. just to include less songs, instead of having us to delete a lot of them. that's one thing that stops me from downloading some of the tape decks.
you should put what you think isn't wack because it is your blog and you seem to have good music taste.
Here's what I'm gonna do: I'll exclude the absolutely-positively-hands-down-without-a-doubt-wack-ass-bullshit tracks. But I'll include stuff that I think is decent.
It's your job to hop into the comment section whenever you see something wack, and lemme know that you don't want that kinda stuff in The Tape Deck. It's the only way I'll know whether to include similar music in the future... or not.
hmmm well generally yes - unless its something we might wanna check out regardless - a lot of people wanna hear say a new kanye or nas joint, even if it turns out to be wack.. but dont post up any more new kids on the block!!!! so u know, jus be selective - thanks 4 ur efforts, much appreciated
Short answer: Yes.
ReplyDeleteShorter answer. Si
ReplyDeleteI agree....but what is wack to you might not be wack to me
ReplyDeleteThat would be the move, Im fed up of having to delete all the bollox tracks anyway, but then again, stuff i like might not be what other readers want, so maybe just keep it the way you already have it, One!
ReplyDeleteGood idea. Even if there is more time between mixtapes, it would be worth the wait.
ReplyDeleteI have been a bit miffed about seeing Bow Wow's name on the list. I think you should exclude any obviously 1/5 garbage.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise, keep it up!
let us make the decision sometimes its cool just to hear new ishh
ReplyDeleteHow are you going to determine what's wack? Even a garbage artists might have 1 banger in the catalogue. Tough call.
ReplyDeleteyou should exclude what's whack. just to include less songs, instead of having us to delete a lot of them.
ReplyDeletethat's one thing that stops me from downloading some of the tape decks.
you should put what you think isn't wack because it is your blog and you seem to have good music taste.
i 2nd that
ReplyDeletei havent downloaded the last few because i end up trashing more than i keep
(still props regardless for introducing me to new tracks ie girl interrupted by dj deadeye)
but yeah--ill cuts only
Argh... conflicting opinions... yay!!
ReplyDeleteHere's what I'm gonna do: I'll exclude the absolutely-positively-hands-down-without-a-doubt-wack-ass-bullshit tracks. But I'll include stuff that I think is decent.
It's your job to hop into the comment section whenever you see something wack, and lemme know that you don't want that kinda stuff in The Tape Deck. It's the only way I'll know whether to include similar music in the future... or not.
Capice?
What do you think?
Exclude wackness..
ReplyDeleteI don't want to dl anything less than 3.5 stars..
Nah keep all the songs and fill the tape up
ReplyDeletehmmm well generally yes - unless its something we might wanna check out regardless - a lot of people wanna hear say a new kanye or nas joint, even if it turns out to be wack.. but dont post up any more new kids on the block!!!! so u know, jus be selective - thanks 4 ur efforts, much appreciated
ReplyDelete